You can prevent branches from disappearing in Source Tree permanently by enabling 'Do not fast-forward when merging, always create commit' in Tools/Options. If you want to decide for each merge operation, there is an option ' Create a new commit even if fast-forward is possible '. Git diff works as expected from the command line but.xlsm files are being treated as binary files by both Sourcetree and Git-Gui. Git xltrail/xl versions 4.0 and 3.1 tested Sourcetree versions 3.1.3 & 3.26 tested Git is version 2.23.0.w. You have to configure SourceTree to use your merge software. In the Diff tab of the Options dialog, look for the Merge tool dropdown for a list of programs that SourceTree knows how to use out of the box. Daniel Russell Sep 18, 2019 I don't understand where to see conflicts and what files need resolution etc. Please refer to video for basic git command line:you want to start a new feature, you create a branch with gi.
Part of your team is hard at work developing a new feature in another branch. They’ve been working on the branch for several days now, and they’ve been committing changes every hour or so. Something comes up, and you need to add some of the code from that branch back into your mainline development branch. (For this example, we’ll assume mainline development occurs in the
master branch.) You’re not ready to merge the entire feature branch into
master just yet. The code you need to grab is isolated to a handful of files, and those files don’t yet exist in the
Buckets o’ fail
This seems like it should be a simple enough task, so we start rummaging through our Git toolbox looking for just the right instrument.
Merge Branch Sourcetree
Idea, the first. Isn’t this exactly what
git cherry-pick is made for? Not so fast. The team has made numerous commits to the files in question.
git cherry-pick wants to merge a commit - not a file - from one branch into another branch. We don’t want to have to track down all the commits related to these files. We just want to grab these files in their current state in the feature branch and drop them into the
master branch. We could hunt down the last commit to each of these files and feed that information to
git cherry-pick, but that still seems like more work than ought to be necessary.
Idea, the second. How ‘bout
git merge --interactive? Sorry. That’s not actually a thing. You’re thinking of
git add --interactive (which won’t work for our purposes either). Nice try though.
Idea, the third. Maybe we can just merge the whole branch using
--squash, keep the files we want, and throw away the rest. Um, yeah, that would work. Eventually. But we want to be done with this task in ten seconds, not ten minutes.
Sourcetree Merge Tool Not Opening
Idea, the fourth. When in doubt, pull out the brute force approach? Surely we can just check out the feature branch, copy the files we need to a directory outside the repo, checkout the
master branch, and then paste the files back in place. Ouch! Yeah. Maybe, but I think we might have our Git license revoked if we resort to such a hack.
The simplest thing that could possibly work
As it turns out, we’re trying too hard. Our good friend
git checkout is the right tool for the job.
We can simply give
git checkout the name of the feature branch1 and the paths to the specific files that we want to add to our master branch.
It sucks when flaky tests slow you down 🐌
I'm building a service called BuildPulse to help you expose unreliable tests and regain trust in your test suite. How do i transfer amazon photos to google photos.
Merge Sourcetree Resolve
git checkoutactually accepts any tree-ish here. So you’re not limited to grabbing code from the current tip of a branch; if needed, you can also check out files using a tag or the SHA for a past commit. ↩